Example: If the Pivot goes up by one (1), then the Margin will decrease by two (2).
The Margin & Pivot Approach is based upon the two analogies of the Political Pendulum and Political Seesaw. Consider the below four election cycles (using National figures) of how the pendulum and seesaw interact and show a similar picture:
(1964: Johnson vs.Goldwater)
(1984: Reagan vs. Mondale)
(2000: Bush vs. Gore)
(1992: Bush, Clinton, and Perot)
By the method of Margin and Pivot, I have identified an estimated Bloc of “Out-of-Line” Votes here in North Carolina at around 1 Million*. These are NOT necessarily “FRAUDULENT” votes, just out-of-line according to historical margins. I do, however, believe a portion of this number fall into the possible category of “election fraud.” There are a number of forces at play here, including changes in demographics/population. But a major portion of this bloc of votes also includes a mostly so-called “legal” type of election fraud called “vote harvesting.”
* Because this method is based upon the difference in the actual margin and what the margin is estimated as having to should have been – based upon historical data, this is an inexact science for determining the exact number of the “Out-of-Line” Bloc of Votes.
– Billy Parker
Do the Math:
(10.0% - 0.72%) x 10,439,388 Population = 968,775
